ancora., following the proportions established before this incremental expansion. The process (more fully explained con the Appendix) is generous sicuro the pagans. Instead of the twelve late pagan sarcophagi cited by Dresken-Weiland, the Chart 2 scadenza include 120. The goal of this exercise was not puro resolve but rather sicuro circumvent the thorny and ultimately insoluble problem of classification.
The evolution of populations and sarcophagi as represented per Charts 1 and 2 are directionally similar but the curves fall more steeply per Chart 2 https://datingranking.net/it/interracialpeoplemeet-review. Footnote 5 The sharper plunge of its upper line reflects and illustrates the decline of the Roman sarcophagus habit and its ultimate disappearance early durante the fifth century. The collapse of the bottom line, asymptotically approaching nulla, points puro per more rapid and totalizing Christianization of the monuments than of their potential occupants. Chart 3 represents this discrepancy more directly, recasting the giorno con the first two charts to amico pagan deaths with pagan sarcophagi.
They were first placed within the half-century date ranges and then allocated between pagan and Christian applying the respective percentages otherwise determined, i
These percentages should not be taken literally; the purpose here is not sicuro measure the disparity between demography and the material supremazia but merely preciso support its existence. Even at this coarse level of granularity, the dissonance is apparent, corroborating the sense in the literature that there are ‘not enough’ late pagan sarcophagi.
The bars per Chart 3 could be levelled either by lowering the percentage of pagan deaths or by raising the percentage of pagan sarcophagi. The demographic assumptions are certainly open puro challenge; there is, per particular, mai consensus regarding the rate of Christianization.